Skip to content

Real Options Valuation for Petroleum Investments

Yao, Yanhua

Masters Degree, Engineering Science, 2006

University of Adelaide

Abstract

In many instances, oil companies struggle with decisions pertaining to petroleum investment. The difficulty partially stems from the uncertainties in many of the inherent variables.  Furthermore, conventional investment methods often fail to properly identify available opportunities.

As commonly acknowledged, traditional valuation methods such as Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) and Net Present Value (NPV) analyses are unable to properly portray investment opportunities. Due to large uncertainties and hence risk in Petroleum Exploration and Production (E & P), investors are gradually turning to a more dynamic approach to investment decisions.

Real Options Valuation involves a methodology for evaluating the value of an opportunity, leading to a strategic decision in an uncertain environment. Based on academic research in finance and business management, Real Options Valuation may be extended from option-pricing tools of the finance sector to that of evaluating E & P projects. In other words, although Real Options thinking has been widely accepted and used in some cases, the wider use of the Real Options approach is still a “hot” debate in the petroleum industry.

A permissible definition of “Real Options” may lead to inconsistencies among Real Options approaches. As such, Real Options may be defined as a company having a right, not an obligation, to invest in a future opportunity. The opportunity may involve technical aspects or may be purely commercial in nature.  In all cases a quantitative approach is required. In the work by Borison (2003) and Bratvold et al (2005), the authors have listed five Real Option methodologies: the Classic approach, the Subjective approach, the Market Disclaimer approach (MAD), the Smith approach, and the Luenberger approach. A comparative analysis of these Real Option approaches is presented in this thesis.

In comparing the above-mentioned Real Options approaches, it is apparent that two types of uncertainties may be considered: technical and market. In the study presented, two petroleum cases are considered: a technical uncertainty dominated case and a market uncertainty dominated case. The technical uncertainty dominated case is related to reservoir management. The market uncertainty dominated case involves a Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) distribution project. The case studies presented demonstrate the functionality of the five Real Options approaches.

This research is multi-disciplinary in nature, integrating the finance option theory with petroleum engineering projects, as well as project management. As such, it is shown that the petroleum industry could benefit from using Real Options Valuation in their investment strategy, thus improving petroleum business performance.


Australian School of Petroleum
THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE

SA 5005 AUSTRALIA

Contact

T: +61 8 8313 8000
F: +61 8 8313 8030
email